(Pic courtesy: Geopolitika.hu and for representation purposes only.)
China. What immediately comes to our mind are those grand shows they put up on world stage. But, as they always say, devil is in the detail. That is, GDP growth of China has been relatively high compared to other countries, over past two decades. This may sound very good at the gist of it. Until you do a health checkup on the quality of GDP Growth. The growth on numbers, which is not necessarily good growth. For example: GDP numbers go up, basis what you manufacture. But, whether it is consumed or not matters a lot – for health of a Nation.
Investing cash surplus generated out of trade deficit with foreign nations. Well, it is not necessarily an investment. It is just a foolish method to control cash surplus by making more cash! Insane! Let me explain.
Internal financial health of China:
Following pointers:- There are close to 13 Million flats unsold per this 2016 news report of Reuters.
- There are fully built cities that are having everything – but people. Like the one in Zhengzhou. Watch video here. (For more such videos on youtube. Just type in “Ghost Cities China”.)
- Sustainable growth is totally dependent when you consume what you produce. China CANNOT consume what it produces, even a significant percent of it.
- Growth in China is inversely proportional to the quality of living. This leaves Chinese people frustrated.
- Workers keep building BIG things like gigantic apartment complexes, which the Chinese middle class can’t consume. Similarly, the vast network of High-speed railway network. Hardly 10% is being used. Why was it built then?
- When not consumed within, and this high over-production leads to trade & cash surplus.
- It is a vicious cycle. If they stop production now, they would crash in a matter of days. So, best thing to keep the production machinery running. And churn out products that none consume.
- Who would then consume it? There comes “One Belt, One Road” project. Now, let’s see the devil in OBOR.
Obligations for Chinese:
- It is the obligation to keep paying the nations to keep them in check. Be it Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar or African Nations. Strategy is same.
- Keep offering money to them that they can’t even think of, to be strategically with Chinese.
Sustainable? NOT. That’s because, “One Belt & One Road” will have it’s own set of issues. More pointers:
- Imported Chinese workers for Chinese investments abroad have routinely run into problems with local population. This happened in Myanmar (Sittwe-Kunming Pipeline project), Sri Lanka (Hambantotta) & Bangladesh (Chittagong / Cox’s Bazar port projects). Even several African nations (Tanzania / Zimbabwe / Congo / Kenya). Pakistan is no exception. It has security related issues
- Ultimately, to keep the Chinese GDP & power to grow, we need more CPECs & debts.
- China, as a Nation will crash & disintegrate, the moment the “constructions” & “debt traps” stop. Within & abroad.
Strategic issues:
- India is opposed to CPEC, as India thinks, it is being encircled. So, the counter-encirclement process has begun. Diplomatic overdrive with Taiwan, Vietnam & others in ASEAN.
- The Torkham gate clashes between Pakistan - Afghanistan has signaled a looming threat to CPEC / CASA / TAPI projects. Which, are to be part of OBOR. Read here.
- Kunming – Sittwe pipeline project has run into issues with Myanmar worried about Chinese gaining importance in peace process among rebels with Myanmar Government. Read here.
- China’s African problem is well known. Investing in places under Politically unstable leaders threatening the very investments. The Diplomat report sums up very well.
- In Thailand – Laos, there has been quite a few anti-China protests over Mekong River ecosystem. Read here.
- China-Pakistan signed an agreement to create what is known as China – Pakistan Economic Corridor.
- China promised to invest an estimated USD 46 Billion in the project, which is part of One Belt, One Road.
- China is investing in ports, power plants, roads / railways to name a few. All seems good, until you read the details.
- CPEC doesn’t benefit ALL the provinces of Pakistan.
- CPEC comes with a repayment obligation that no learned person would ever take it. For example: Guaranteed rate of return @ 17% per annum.
- Equipment & labor would be from China. So, overall not more than one-fourth would be spent on local services. You can read this Dawn.com article for more details.
- Rest of 2/3rd cost of CPEC would go back to China in oiling it’s over-production machinery. This is just helping to consume part of that HUGE machinery.
- So, to keep significant amount of that machinery running, they need more Pakistans & more CPECs.
- This is not all. China has pledged an additional USD 50 Billion today on Indus River Cascade. Report here.
- Mind you, most of the said Billions has already made it’s way to China through “purchases of equipments” & “cost of labour” by Chinese Contractors.
- At a rate of 2% interest, with a dwindling Pakistani economy, you can imagine how long it will take to repay the debt of USD 96 Billion. Until then, Pakistan would do whatever China asks it to do. Just a gesture enough from China.
- On the other side, there are inter-provincial ramifications within Pakistan that they’re beginning to feel the heat of CPEC.
- Balochistan, KP-FATA are against CPEC as that doesn’t benefit them much. And, there’s a perception that Chinese are looting their resources.
- People of Sindh & Pakistan Occupied Kashmir think Chinese are colonizing them. Recently even Karachi’s Power supply & Stock exchanges are being taken over by Chinese Cos.
- In a year or two, CPEC would be dubbed as Curse on Pakistan's Existance by China.
- Chinese President Xi Jinping’s pet project OBOR is not showing Chinese prowess. But, it is a sign of desperateness at an unimaginable level. OBOR meet today is one such. Look at their body language. They even brought several world leaders in “China Eastern Airlines”.
Conclusion:
China’s “One belt, One road” is like a cash surplus person. Buying things that one can’t maintain / building home which one won’t live in are similar. things than betterment of self. The investment is to buy people just by pouring in money.Fact is, it is not sustainable.
"People coming near you for money, won’t stick for long. They will use your money, enjoy good times with you. When you are unable to pay them enough, they’ll move away from you." - Indian proverbSo, when I view through Indian philosophy, “One Belt, One Road” is a trap for both the Chinese & the nations part of it.
In a nutshell: “One Belt, One Road” is, the coalition of cash surplus. Should be renamed as: “One Debt, One Road – The Silk Road to Debt trap.”
(The above got published on OneIndia on July 10, 2017. Read here.)